This article really, really scares me… because the homeless people involved are in a nearly identical situation to me. The landlord who lets all of us stay here is a kind, hardworking man. For very low rent, far lower than we could find anywhere else, we have a series of trailers/garages/sheds to stay in.
Yet, let’s be honest, things aren’t up to code. If anybody ever cared enough to make it difficult for him, he’d be in the same bind as 66-year-old Dan de Vaul, the San Luis Obispo man who was just sentenced to 90 days in jail for “safety violations” on his ranch property, where he allowed homeless people to stay in his barn and trailers, in exchange for maintaining a clean and sober lifestyle. De Vaul provided free counseling and dental visits for the residents, and he also gave them opportunities to work and maintain an income during their stay, as they transitioned back into mainstream society and located jobs and apartments. You can read more about de Vaul’s registered nonprofit, Sunny Acres, at its website.
De Vaul was offered a choice between probation and jail. He chose the jail time, because the terms of his probation would have required him to evict the 30 homeless people residing on his ranch, and his conscience would not allow him to do that. He had the integrity to put the welfare of those 30 people above his own, baldly stating to the media “I’m proud to go to jail for housing the homeless”.
The day following de Vaul’s conviction, he was bailed out of jail on appeal… the $500 bail bond was paid by one of the jurors who convicted him, Mary Partin. She claimed to have been pressured to convict de Vaul, although she believed in his innocence. Jury misconduct is the basis of de Vaul’s appeal.
The whole case makes me feel ill, frankly. SLO is a few hours north of me and has a real problem with a shortage of housing for homeless individuals. I have at least two personal friends in the area who have been homeless at one point (Michael of SLOHomeless and Rev. Cynthia over at Homeless Tales). Yet, neighbors and police persisted in bringing charges upon a man who was doing so much good for others. Apparently sleeping rough on a curb or bench is less of a safety issue than sleeping in a converted barn that doesn’t meet code.
The results of de Vaul’s appeal remain to be seen. However, the whole case got me thinking about my own circumstances. From the photos on de Vaul’s website, Sunny Acres looks a bit ramshackle, yes. But then, so does the property where I’m staying. And yet, it’s something. It’s a far preferable alternative to sleeping rough (or yes, even camping out in a Walmart parking lot without utilities hookups). It’s also, for many, a distinct notch above staying in a shelter, for many reasons. The safety and privacy of my current circumstances far rivals any shelter I could find in the area. And none of us have to wander the streets during the day, before being admitted at night. We all have our own little area and niche. We are less limited as to the amount of personal belongings we are able to retain. We even have access to water, electricity, and the internet.
I will be leaving relatively soon, I know that. I am here pending the receipt of the advance money for my book, and then Matt and I would like to get an apartment for ourselves and Fezzik, and scrupulously use the rest of the funds to work our way toward our ultimate goal: a house.
But the people that I have befriended here, will still be here. Some of them have been here for several years, or have left and then come back. I may no longer have to worry, but they do. All it takes is some complete douchebag to report the good man who has spent years helping those with nowhere else to go, and then their lives (and his) are turned all topsy-turvy.
This realization worries and sickens me.

I posted this update over at 
I’ve been mildly irked because I hadn’t heard from Matt in a couple of days… the rural town in Scotland he lives in (Huntly) has very crappy internet connection (as the internet company told him over the phone, “We don’t put masts up for cows!”) so often his internet will go down for several hours or even a day or two.